Persuasive strategies used in the film Thank-you for Smoking.
Analysis Of The Movie ' Thank You For Smoking ' Essay 769 Words 4 Pages In the film, Thank you for smoking, director Jason Reitman follows the exploits of the tobacco industry’s primary spokesman. Nick Naylor is a lobbyist who uses superior spin tactics to extol the virtues of smoking all while trying to remain a good example for his young son.The movie “Thank You for Smoking” cuts across certain cultural values such as dealing with manipulation, dishonesty and deception in an individual private and public lives and as such, it is especially struggling for professional mediators and negotiators.In conclusion, Thank You for Smoking provides great examples of the three pillars of rhetoric: logos, pathos, and ethos. The idea of placing a skull and crossbones on all cigarette boxes provides an excellent platform for rhetorical analysis, as does the concept of the film as a whole.
The film Thank-you for smoking is a masterpiece of the art of persuasion. Throughout the movie, it is clear that the aspect of persuasion is widely used. The intention of both the writer and the director is unquestionably an agenda of trying to convince the audience to conceive the idea.Based on a book by Christopher Buckley, Thank You for Smoking follows the unapologetic Naylor as he spins for cigarettes in the major media, including an appearance on the Joan Lunden Show in which he defends the industry before a hostile studio audience while seated next to a bald teen dying of smoking-related cancer—and wins at least some of them over.
Satirical comedy follows the machinations of Big Tobacco's chief spokesman, Nick Naylor, who spins on behalf of cigarettes while trying to remain a role model for his twelve-year-old son. The chief spokesperson and lobbyist Nick Naylor is the Vice President of the Academy of Tobacco Studies. He is talented in speaking and spins arguments to.
